Condividi questo articolo

Circle Urges User Caution As Bitcoin Hard Fork Looms

Circle has suggested in an email to users that, in order to avoid the consequences of a potential hard fork, they may want to to sell their bitcoin.

Aggiornato 11 set 2021, 1:10 p.m. Pubblicato 21 mar 2017, 11:00 p.m. Tradotto da IA
Bank

Payments startup Circle suggested in an email to users today that, in order to avoid the potential negative consequences of a hard fork on the network, they may want to to sell their bitcoins.

In an email late Monday, Circle – which dropped support for buying and selling bitcoin in December, but still offers wallet services – outlined its contingency plan ahead of a possible network split.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Non perderti un'altra storia.Iscriviti alla Newsletter Crypto Daybook Americas oggi. Vedi tutte le newsletter

According to Circle's missive (which accompanied a lengthy update to the its user agreement), its bitcoin services could be disrupted "for an extended period of time" should a fork take place. Services interrupted would include the ability for users to convert holdings from bitcoin to another available currency on the platform.

Yet, Circle went on to advise users to move their bitcoins to other platforms – or consider selling them altogether.

The startup wrote:

"The only way to avoid the potential negative consequences of a bitcoin fork is to not hold bitcoin. Just go to Settings > Currency and convert your balance to dollars, pounds or euro (availability is based on where you live). You'll then be able to hold those funds with Circle or cash out instantly."

According to the language added to the user agreement, Circle indicated that the disruption of its bitcoin services could happen within a short span of time and "until Circle has determined in its sole discretion that such functionality can be restored".

"This bitcoin downtime will likely occur immediately upon a 'fork' of bitcoin with little to no warning, and during this period of bitcoin downtime you will not have access to bitcoin that you hold in your Circle account," the startup wrote.

The comments are the latest the find representatives from the technology's business community weighing in on bitcoin's scaling debate, a years-long dispute over the network's future that has escalated in recent days.

Miners and developers are now showing a determination to back separate roadmaps for the technology, adding to widespread perception two competing bitcoin blockchains (and bitcoin tokens) could soon become available on the market.

Disclosure: CoinDesk is a subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which has an ownership stake in Circle.

Image via Shutterstock

Di più per voi

Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

GP Basic Image

Cosa sapere:

  • As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
  • GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
  • Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.

More For You

Zcash Floats Dynamic Fee Plan to Ensure Users Won’t Be Priced Out

(Christian Dubovan/Unsplash, modified by CoinDesk)

ZEC zoomed 12% amid the fee discussion, beating gains across all major tokens.

What to know:

  • A new proposal by Shielded Labs suggests a dynamic fee market for Zcash to address rising transaction costs and network congestion.
  • The proposed system uses a median fee per action observed over the prior 50 blocks, with a priority lane for high-demand periods.
  • The changes aim to maintain Zcash's privacy features while avoiding complex protocol redesigns.