{"id":24197,"date":"2017-03-14T15:05:23","date_gmt":"2017-03-14T15:05:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ci027cfe64e0152697"},"modified":"2017-03-14T15:05:23","modified_gmt":"2017-03-14T15:05:23","slug":"fusing-blockchain-and-iot-interview-filaments-ceo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/business\/fusing-blockchain-and-iot-interview-filaments-ceo","title":{"rendered":"Fusing Blockchain and IoT: An Interview With Filament\u2019s CEO"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"bsf_rt_marker\"><\/div><figure><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/fusing-blockchain-and-iot-an-interview-with-filaments-ceo.jpg\" title=\"\"><\/figure>\n<p>For Allison Clift-Jennings, her interest in blockchain technology was fueled by some research she was engaged in around three disciplines that have long intrigued her \u2014 philosophy, economics and technology. She first began printing out the various research papers and writings of people who were in a similar exploratory mode \u2014 people like David Chaum, Ryan Fugger and Ian Grigg \u2014 back in 2005.<\/p>\n<p> \u201cI had this strange drive to try to unify \u2014 in my own head \u2014 these different disciplines and see if there was something that could come from it. I still have the binder of these early explorations, along with my own notes, and it\u2019s fun to revisit from time to time,\u201d said Clift-Jennings in an interview with Bitcoin Magazine.<\/p>\n<p>With a degree in computer science from the University of Nevada, Reno, Clift-Jennings says her work over the years has been highly informed by systems theory: \u201cMy interest in this discipline is really a graduation of sorts, from the earlier work being done within the cryptocurrency, cypherpunk, counter-economic and distributed systems fields. Systems theory has served as a resolution to my mind\u2019s drive to unify all these different disciplines.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Now, as the CEO of <a href=\"https:\/\/filament.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Filament<\/a>, a company firmly entrenched within the Internet of Things (IoT) movement, her efforts focus on fusing and connecting legacy, industrial infrastructure with blockchain technology. She says that 70 percent of the existing machines and infrastructures running in various industrial verticals such as mining, oil and gas, manufacturing, aerospace and the like are all currently disconnected today. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cFilament focuses on this infrastructure, to make it smart and connected. We provide a hardware and software platform that provides this functionality. And we utilize a pretty novel economic stack that allows devices to self-enforce their own contractual agreements between parties.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Continues Clift-Jennings: \u201cSome call this an on-device, off-chain smart contract platform. I like that definition \u2014 though it\u2019s important to clarify that these contracts do not run in a blockchain \u2014 they merely verify inputs and outputs via a blockchain. This protocol stack is called Blocklet.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Filament is a platform to deliver the ubiquitous connectivity of <a href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/telehash\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Telehash<\/a> with the economic \u201ctransact-ability\u201d of <a href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/vivien\/i3blocks\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Blocklet<\/a> directly to machines in the industrial IoT space. This is where things get interesting.<\/p>\n<p>Blockchain technology is in the early stages of playing a major role in IoT\u2019s advancement by boosting security and allowing myriad types of devices greater utility and ease in management. Tech firm IBM is one of a handful of companies at the forefront of this movement. For example, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ibm.com\/internet-of-things\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IBM Watson IoT blockchain <\/a>enables IoT devices to participate in transactions. By utilizing the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ibm.com\/internet-of-things\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Watson IoT Platform<\/a>, it is now possible for device information such as that relayed through RFID-based locations, barcode-scan events or data device aggregators to be integrated with the IBM blockchain.<\/p>\n<p>The alignment of blockchain technology and IoT is also allowing for advancements in terms of supply chain systems optimization, digital passports for proof of authenticity and origin, and auditable records. The effective curation of this information provides ease of sharing with regulatory agencies and insurers.<\/p>\n<p>But perhaps the biggest value proposition for blockchain technology in this entire equation is security. \u201cIndeed, security used to be the fourth or fifth question prospective customers would ask us. Now it\u2019s the first or second \u2014 and for good reason,\u201d says Clift-Jennings.<\/p>\n<p>For Filament, that means security and privacy for IoT devices absolutely must start at the hardware level. Clift-Jennings says that it is inexcusable in 2017 for hardware to be made without secure elements or cryptographic key storage chips in them. \u201cThey are cheap, they are relatively secure and tamper-resistant. So there is no excuse not to include them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Once you have a secure method to store keys, and sign and encrypt data, then you can begin to build upon that, she adds.<\/p>\n<p>Filament\u2019s approach is to start with a secure element on each device \u2014 with a whole host of keys that get burned into a write-once or one-time-programmable (OTP) memory. Then Filament builds contractual agreements based on the <a href=\"http:\/\/jose.readthedocs.io\/en\/latest\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">JOSE standard <\/a>&nbsp;before binding the capabilities of a device to these contractual parameters. Encrypting Filament\u2019s firmware and on-device system thus ensures privacy and security while data is at rest on the device.<\/p>\n<p>Telehash, an end-to-end encrypted P2P protocol, is the way the company secures and keeps private data in transit. Here, everything from device accessibility to firmware updating to on-device flash storage to even BLE packet communications and USB serial traffic is all encrypted, from end to end. <\/p>\n<p>\u201c[Telehash] really doesn\u2019t care what network medium one is using,\u201d Clift-Jennings notes. \u201cSo we can easily encrypt data coming off of a USB serial line (for instance, connected to a large manufacturing machine\u2019s diagnostic port) and transport that data \u2014 secure and private \u2014 to an endpoint that might be in the cloud.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Clift-Jennings says that the Telehash protocol is very good at minimizing, and in many situations eliminating, metadata, so that very little leakage of data occurs even when using encryption. This becomes very important, she asserts, for privacy concerns. As <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nybooks.com\/daily\/2014\/05\/10\/we-kill-people-based-metadata\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Michael Hayden, former director of the NSA and CIA, has stated: people are killed based on metadata.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Looking Ahead<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>According to Clift-Jennings, these are the four most interesting areas to follow over the coming year or two:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;First, digital currency will not be going away. Bitcoin will find its way somehow \u2014 it may be SegWit, it may be Unlimited. But it will likely not be where it is today. This is a good thing.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Second, the first permissioned blockchains \u2014 probably based on Hyperledger \u2014 will begin to deploy within particular industrial verticals. Perhaps the National Mining Association will have one for mining, the National Association of Manufacturing for manufacturing and so on. Why industrial-specific? Because they all have different needs and requirements, and none (to my knowledge at least) are interested in using Bitcoin or Ethereum\u2019s blockchain to distribute their trust.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Third, another DAO will be attempted. This idea, while initially not a resounding success, is the right direction long-term. Giving birth to things is messy!<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Fourth, devices via the Internet of Things will become a new smart contract platform. I know this feels self-serving to Filament, but I just can\u2019t imagine that devices will be as ubiquitous and powerful and voluminous as we expect, and we will be requiring all of them to run their contracts in a blockchain in the cloud. That doesn\u2019t scale, it\u2019s not performant and isn\u2019t necessary. Devices only need blockchains to verify, not to execute.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Clift-Jennings says she\u2019s also very excited for lightning network\u2019s payment channels, as well as the early work being done to try to bring a fair payment\/royalty framework to creative works \u2014 though she laments that it seems like a very, very hard problem to solve. \u201cBut if I were a pessimist, I certainly wouldn\u2019t be in this industry!<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMy hope for Filament for 2017 is that we will be able to talk about and \u2014 more important \u2014 show examples of our platform doing the things we describe, at scale, for customers. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd as far as our long-term vision, it\u2019s my hope that Filament\u2019s platform \u2014 and others like it \u2014 will enable entire new ways of building and sustaining industry. So much of it we take for granted today, but if \u2014 through automation and attestation \u2014 we can cut industrial costs down significantly and make them more efficient, we will output less waste, will scale better, and we drive toward a future I think we will all prefer.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For Allison Clift-Jennings, her interest in blockchain technology was fueled by some research she was engaged in around three disciplines that have long intrigued her \u2014 philosophy, economics and technology. She first began printing out the various research papers and writings of people who were in a similar exploratory mode \u2014 people like David Chaum, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3515,"featured_media":24198,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[556,2776,1455,3527],"class_list":{"0":"post-24197","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-business","8":"tag-blockchain","9":"tag-fintech","10":"tag-interview","11":"tag-iot"},"author_data":{"id":3515,"name":"Michael Scott","nicename":"michael-scott","avatar_url":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/michael-scott-promo-image-96x96.jpg"},"featured_image_url":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/fusing-blockchain-and-iot-an-interview-with-filaments-ceo.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3515"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24197"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24197\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24198"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}