{"id":23058,"date":"2017-10-26T01:40:45","date_gmt":"2017-10-26T01:40:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ci027cfe6e80102697"},"modified":"2017-10-26T01:40:45","modified_gmt":"2017-10-26T01:40:45","slug":"trustlessness-action-particls-model","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/press-releases\/trustlessness-action-particls-model","title":{"rendered":"Trustlessness in Action: Particl&#8217;s Model"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"bsf_rt_marker\"><\/div><figure><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/trustlessness-in-action-particls-model.jpg\" title=\"\"><\/figure>\n<p>\u201cTrustlessness\u201d is a term often<br \/> quoted as a feature of blockchain technology but what does that mean and is absolute<br \/> zero trust a myth or really true? Praised as one of the characteristics that<br \/> make the blockchain so revolutionary, a trustless system is one where two peers<br \/> can enter a virtual hand shake agreement, i.e. <a href=\"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/articles\/yes-bitcoin-can-do-smart-contracts-and-particl-demonstrates-how\">&nbsp;smart contract<\/a>, without relying on a<br \/> trusted third party to facilitate. <\/p>\n<p>Blockchains are good at being<br \/> permissionless and having decentralized tasks that are recorded on an auditable<br \/> ledger, yet not all blockchains are completely trustless, and achieving full<br \/> trustlessness is challenging if not impossible. Even<br \/> an open-source project like Bitcoin that is constantly being reviewed can have<br \/> trust issues, not from the code but by the developers and reviewers of the<br \/> code. So trustlessness is more of a term describing an ideal state on the<br \/> blockchain where code is law with the caveat that humans write code and to err<br \/> is human.<\/p>\n<p>Before looking at how a fully<br \/> trustless blockchain can be implemented by privacy advocates like <a href=\"https:\/\/particl.io\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Particl<\/a> \u2014 an open-source project that is building<br \/> a decentralized ecommerce application on the blockchain \u2014 let\u2019s look at the<br \/> obstacles standing in the way. <\/p>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>I Trust<br \/> You, Until I Don\u2019t<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re conditioned to think of<br \/> trust as a good thing. Traditionally, positive human relationships have<br \/> required a level of trust. From an economic perspective, however, trust has significant<br \/> downsides. <\/p>\n<p>The greatest drawback is that trust<br \/> can be broken. When you engage in a transaction with someone you believe to be<br \/> trustworthy, but then they fail to deliver the promised goods or services, you<br \/> suffer. In<br \/> addition, trust is not efficient. It has to be cultivated and you have to<br \/> invest time in evaluating how much another party can be trusted before you<br \/> engage in a trade.<\/p>\n<p>Blockchain technology can be<br \/> leveraged to overcome the risks and inefficiencies that are associated with<br \/> trust. With<br \/> the right approach, it\u2019s possible to make reliable transactions on the<br \/> blockchain without knowing or trusting the person or group you are dealing with.<br \/> That is because the blockchain can be used to enforce good behavior.<\/p>\n<p>In Particl\u2019s case, by creating<br \/> a simple smart contract, you can ensure that if one party in a transaction<br \/> fails to uphold their end of a deal, the blockchain can automatically cancel<br \/> the transaction or punish the misbehaving party in another way. In effect, this<br \/> feature makes it impossible for a malicious user to profit by taking advantage<br \/> of the trust that another user places in them without inflicting harm on<br \/> themselves as well.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The<br \/> Trustless Challenge<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If you buy or sell something<br \/> using Bitcoin, you don\u2019t automatically gain protection against being cheated: default<br \/> Bitcoin transactions are non-reversible. The ability of the blockchain to<br \/> enable transactions that are both trustless and reliable is difficult because<br \/> it needs to be done without the intervention of a third party. In conventional<br \/> trading contexts, transactions are typically policed by a central authority that<br \/> evaluates claims about broken trust and responds accordingly. For example, if a<br \/> seller cheats you on eBay, you can complain to eBay and request a refund. These<br \/> authorities also charge fees or percentages of sales revenue whether they are<br \/> used or not.<\/p>\n<p>The downside to this approach<br \/> is that it compromises privacy. In order to provide this protection against<br \/> broken trust, a platform like eBay oversees transactions. It knows what buyers<br \/> and sellers are doing. With a two-person trustless escrow, in contrast, reliable<br \/> transactions can be implemented without the oversight of a third party. You<br \/> don\u2019t have to lose privacy to gain reliability.<\/p>\n<p>The tricky thing about<br \/> achieving true trustlessness on a privacy-focused blockchain is that it doesn\u2019t<br \/> happen by default. Although multiple times more efficient than building trust<br \/> in public, smart contracts still need to be signed and the exchange of goods or<br \/> services still needs to happen. The beauty is that an agreement can be made and<br \/> successfully carried out even if one or both parties don\u2019t fully trust each<br \/> other.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A Trustless<br \/> Solution<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Particl leverages Bitcoin as<br \/> the underlying blockchain protocol, but adds privacy enhancements that make it<br \/> possible for users to perform transactions that are trustless, reliable and<br \/> private. In an innovative development, PART transactions do not require users<br \/> to write smart contracts themselves. Instead, this feature is built into the<br \/> platform.<\/p>\n<p>Central to Particl\u2019s approach<br \/> to trustless transactions is mutually assured destruction (MAD) escrow. <a href=\"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/articles\/particl-takes-mad-approach-escrows-maximizing-privacy\">MAD<br \/> escrow<\/a> is a special type of smart contract that prevents either party from<br \/> profiting in the event that one cheats during a transaction.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, because the smart<br \/> contract is enforced automatically via the blockchain, Particl developers play<br \/> no role in overseeing transactions. Their platform guarantees privacy while<br \/> achieving trustlessness at the same time. Two people from anywhere in the world<br \/> can enter into a binding agreement that is only finalized when both agree it is<br \/> completed.<\/p>\n<p>Blockchain technology\u2019s promise<br \/> is that users are no longer bound by the inefficiencies and risks associated<br \/> with trust in order to make transactions. Most blockchains, however, do not yet<br \/> implement truly trustless transactions. Particl is an exception, as it was developed<br \/> with trustlessness at its core from the start. Particl developers aim to \u201csquare<br \/> the circle\u201d by delivering trustless ecommerce without compromising reliability<br \/> or privacy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cTrustlessness\u201d is a term often quoted as a feature of blockchain technology but what does that mean and is absolute zero trust a myth or really true? Praised as one of the characteristics that make the blockchain so revolutionary, a trustless system is one where two peers can enter a virtual hand shake agreement, i.e. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3464,"featured_media":23059,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-23058","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-press-releases"},"author_data":{"id":3464,"name":"Btc Studios","nicename":"btc-studios","avatar_url":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/system-diy-promo-image-96x96.png"},"featured_image_url":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/trustlessness-in-action-particls-model.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23058","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3464"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23058"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23058\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23059"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23058"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23058"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23058"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}