{"id":20813,"date":"2018-12-05T02:23:24","date_gmt":"2018-12-05T02:23:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ci027cfe7110022697"},"modified":"2018-12-05T02:23:24","modified_gmt":"2018-12-05T02:23:24","slug":"bitcoins-tech-trends-2018-what-year-brought-us-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/technical\/bitcoins-tech-trends-2018-what-year-brought-us-part-1","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin\u2019s Tech Trends of 2018: What This Year Brought Us (Part 1)"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>
<\/figure>\n

Where 2017\u2019s dizzying price highs embedded \u201chodl\u201d into the public consciousness, 2018 was the year that \u201cbuidl” became a trend in the crypto-industry \u2014 and Bitcoin was no exception.<\/p>\n

Anticipated in Bitcoin Magazine\u2019s<\/em> first cover story of the year<\/a>, Bitcoin\u2019s technological progress only accelerated in 2018. Improving Bitcoin from around the world, developers and entrepreneurs furthered Segregated Witness adoption, rolled out the Lightning Network, released privacy solutions, realized sidechains and made progress on a Schnorr signature solution \u2014 all of which were still around the corner only a year ago. <\/p>\n

Following up on January\u2019s cover story, 2018\u2019s closing two-parter cover story explores how these five technologies progressed.<\/p>\n

In part one: Segregated Witness and the Lightning Network.<\/p>\n

Segregated Witness<\/h2>\n

The Segregated<\/a> Witness<\/a> (SegWit) soft fork that activated in August 2017 was arguably Bitcoin\u2019s biggest protocol upgrade to date. Fixing the long-standing malleability bug, it better enabled second-layer protocols while replacing Bitcoin\u2019s block size limit with a block weight limit. Transactions that utilize SegWit are partly stored in a new part of Bitcoin blocks, allowing the network to process more than one megabyte of transaction data per 10 minutes.<\/p>\n

Back in 2017, SegWit adoption was off to a somewhat slow start. By the end of the year, most wallets had not integrated the upgrade yet \u2014 and not many exchanges or other Bitcoin service providers had either. At the start of this year, less than 15 percent of transactions utilized the additional block space, and blocks barely exceeded 1.1 megabytes.<\/p>\n

Throughout 2018, however, adoption increased quite a bit, as more wallets and services implemented SegWit. This perhaps most notably included the Bitcoin Core wallet, which enabled SegWit transactions with its 0.16.0 release<\/a> in March. Other popular wallets, such as Coinomi (March<\/a>), Bither (September<\/a>) and BRD (November<\/a>) followed suit, while Mycelium is expected<\/a> to roll out the feature before the end of the year. Some of the biggest Bitcoin service providers also implemented Segregated Witness in 2018, including Coinbase (February<\/a>), Bitfinex (February<\/a>) and Xapo (May<\/a>).<\/p>\n

As an overall result, SegWit usage statistics increased to well over 40 percent<\/a> over the year. Still, while about a threefold increase, this is lower than some would have expected it to be by now.<\/p>\n

\u201cI’d say the main reason SegWit usage isn\u2019t well over 50 percent by now is inertia,\u201d Coinmetrics data analyst Antoine Le Calvez speculated when asked by Bitcoin Magazine<\/em>. \u201cIf you didn’t adopt it when fees exploded last year \u2014 either due to lack of time or other priorities \u2014 I don’t think you’d support it until fees explode again, when SegWit transactions will have a clear cost advantage over non-SegWit transactions.\u201d<\/p>\n

On top of SegWit itself, the new bech32 address format also saw its first non-trivial adoption in 2018. These addresses, that start with \u201cbc1\u201d instead of a 1 or a 3, are a natural fit for SegWit. Transactions from such addresses require less data to be included in a block and are, therefore, even cheaper. Several wallets \u2014 like Coinomi, Electrum and Wasabi \u2014 moved straight to this new format.<\/p>\n

The popular BRD wallet for iOS and Android did this too and, in September, even launched a campaign to further bech32 adoption<\/a>: \u201cWhen SegWit?<\/a>\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe’ve always taken the stance that bech32 stood the best chance of being the gold standard for SegWit implementation,\u201d said BRD CSO Aaron Lasher, in explaining the idea behind the initiative to Bitcoin Magazine<\/em>. \u201cThe backwards compatibility of using P2SH-enabled SegWit gave the industry a much-needed jump start, but to really drive adoption, raw SegWit is the way to go.\u201d<\/p>\n

He continued:<\/p>\n

\u201cAs one of the larger wallets, we enjoy an element of influence over the state of the network, as a non-trivial percentage of bitcoin transactions are conducted through BRD wallets. Getting wallets and other service providers to upgrade their software to interact with bech32 addresses is the goal in general, and with this initiative we’re targeting them in a respectful and persuasive manner.\u201d<\/p>\n

Perhaps thanks to the campaign, in part, and on top of SegWit adoption itself, bech32 use increased<\/a> throughout 2018 as well.<\/p>\n

“5.6 percent of the outputs created these days are bech32 outputs,” Le Calvez said, \u201cthough bech32 outputs store only ~0.8 percent of all bitcoin, so it means that bech32 users are quite active. That could be because Coinbase and LocalBitcoins support it, and exchanges attract arbitrageurs that move money around faster. Another reason could be that, since bech32 is the cheapest way to transact, it attracts high-activity users.\u201d<\/p>\n

All in all, Bitcoin blocks have grown along with SegWit adoption over the past year. While average numbers aren\u2019t quite as telling (because not all blocks fill up in the first place), the typical full block today is around 1.3 megabytes. The biggest Bitcoin block to date<\/a> was also mined this year, in October by ViaBTC, and was a little over 2.3 megabytes.<\/p>\n

The Lightning Network<\/h2>\n

Highly anticipated for years<\/a>, 2018 was the year that the<\/a> Lightning<\/a> Network<\/a> made its \u201cofficial\u201d debut. Although the risky nature of early stage tech was conveyed through the #reckless<\/em> hashtag, regular users were invited to try out Bitcoin\u2019s overlay network for fast and cheap transactions for the first time.<\/p>\n

In March, Lightning Labs was the first to announce<\/a> the beta release of Ind, the software implementation it\u2019s spearheading, and collected a $2.5 million seed investment round to boot. This was followed by the beta release of ACINQ\u2019s eclair later that same month<\/a> and Blockstream\u2019s c-lightning in June<\/a>. Since September<\/a>, Casa even lets you host a physical Lightning node in your home: the Casa Node. In conjunction, several Lightning wallets<\/a> were made available, and even more of them are coming, including some from established Bitcoin wallet providers like Trezor and Electrum.<\/p>\n

Probably at least as important, Lightning payments are increasingly accepted for real goods and services.<\/p>\n

One of the very earliest adopters of the Lightning Network was a prepaid top-up service Bitrefill, in March<\/a> of this year. CEO Sergej Kotliar has been keeping a close eye on Lightning Network usage since, telling Bitcoin Magazine<\/em>:<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve processed 2,170 regular Lightning orders at this point, receiving a total of 6.3 bitcoin. The share of Lightning payments is steadily growing and is currently at about 2.5 percent of our bitcoin orders. We\u2019re generally waiting on two things for this to take off bigly: more wallets and exchange integration.\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/figure>\n

While it was not very necessary this year, as Bitcoin fees have been negligible for most of 2018, Kotliar also tracked how many on-chain transactions were avoided by using the Lightning Network. <\/p>\n

\u201cI basically added up all channels, opened and closed, and how many payments and forwards have been made, as a sort of measure of scaling efficiency,\u201d he explained. \u201cThis adds up to 2.75 payments per on-chain transaction, and 3.46 payments per on-chain transaction, if we include forwarded Lightning transactions. This number grew steadily over the past couple of months as channel reliability improves and the network grows.\u201d<\/p>\n

Besides Bitrefill, other pioneering adopters included the Blockstream store (since January<\/a>) and bill payment service Living Room of Satoshi (since April<\/a>). Payment processor BTCPay integrated Lightning payments in July<\/a>, offering it to all its users (like TorGuard VPN<\/a> and Coincards<\/a>). So did payment provider CoinGate in September<\/a>, on-boarding the Lamassu<\/a> Bitcoin ATM network, bullion store Bitgild<\/a>, and hundreds more merchants. And the first exchange started to accept Lightning payments for deposits in 2018 as well: gold-to-bitcoin exchange Vaultoro (since May<\/a>). [Edit: Payment processor GloBee also started accepting Lightning payments, in June<\/a>.]<\/p>\n

At least as impressive was the level of community involvement in such a new technology. Berlin-based Lightning startup Fulmo, for example, organized a series of popular \u201cHackdays<\/a>\u201d: three in the German capital and one in New York. Developers and anyone else with interest could come and learn about the technology and build on it on the spot. Also in New York, Bitcoin development company Chaincode Labs focused its third \u201cBitcoin Residency<\/a>\u201d program on the Lightning Network, too.<\/p>\n

As an entirely new phenomenon, and partly the result of these events, a number of Lightning apps (\u201cLapps\u201d) were introduced over the course of the year.<\/p>\n

“Lightning has enabled people to build lots of cool things with bitcoin and it’s unlocking a whole new potential. Things that we haven’t even thought of today,” Lightning Labs CEO Elizabeth Stark told Bitcoin Magazine<\/em>. “Every day we wake up and someone has built something new.”<\/p>\n

Stark’s Lightning Labs has tried to keep track of available Lapps in its Lightning App Directory<\/a>. Examples include a jukebox, a tipping solution and a file-hosting solution, all powered by Blockstream\u2019s micropayment processing system Lightning Charge, showcased during the company\u2019s \u201cWeek of Lapps<\/a>\u201d in March. Another particularly useful Lapp that launched this year is Submarine Swaps<\/a>, which allows users to pay Lightning invoices even without having a Lightning wallet Further, the hackdays produced photobooths, point of sale payment processors and games. And the Lightning Network even saw the emergence of what can arguably be considered its first \u201ckiller app\u201d: The million-dollar, homepage-inspired, web graffiti platform satoshis.place<\/a> went viral through Bitcoin social media last summer.<\/p>\n

All this activity translated into data<\/a>, too. Although publicly available Lightning Network statistics are not completely reliable \u2014 some aspects of the network are hard or impossible to measure \u2014 various<\/a> Lightning Network explorers show that there are several thousand Lightning nodes online on any day. Between them, they have more than 10 thousand payment channels open, holding hundreds of bitcoins worth almost two million dollars, and all this is growing fast.<\/p>\n

In the meantime, code supporting the Lightning Network is only improving, and more parts of the protocol are being fleshed out. In November, a group of Lightning developers from different implementations met for a second Lightning Summit<\/a> in Adelaide, Australia \u2014 after the first one in Milan in 2016<\/a>. Here, the \u201cBOLT\u201d Lightning Network specification made a leap forward, paving the way for more innovation for 2019 and beyond<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe second Lightning Summit reaffirmed that this is an open community interested in moving a common vision of an open network forward,\u201d said Blockstream and c-lightning developer Christian Decker. \u201cIt puts all the things that we postponed in the first meeting back on the table and opens up a second exploratory phase for all the nice-to-have features. Splicing and multipath routing for example allow us to hide all the details about channel allocations of funds: the user just sees a single balance that is available both off- and on-chain.\u201d<\/p>\n

In part two of this article, to be published in two weeks: privacy, sidechains and Schnorr signatures.<\/em><\/p>\n

This article was updated.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Where 2017\u2019s dizzying price highs embedded \u201chodl\u201d into the public consciousness, 2018 was the year in which \u201cbuidl” became a trend in the crypto-industry \u2014 and Bitcoin was no exception.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2509,"featured_media":20814,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[138,1252,460,1079],"class_list":{"0":"post-20813","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-technical","8":"tag-bitrefill","9":"tag-lightning-labs","10":"tag-lightning-network","11":"tag-segwit"},"author_data":{"id":2509,"name":"Aaron van Wirdum","nicename":"aaron-van-wirdum","avatar_url":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/aaron-van-wirdum-96x96.jpg"},"featured_image_url":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bitcoins-tech-trends-of-2018-what-this-year-brought-us-part-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20813","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2509"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20813"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20813\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20814"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20813"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20813"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}