{"id":20297,"date":"2019-04-11T19:03:34","date_gmt":"2019-04-11T19:03:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ci027cfe6fe00f26c3"},"modified":"2025-01-28T15:40:37","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T15:40:37","slug":"with-latest-partnership-ledger-vault-offers-a-fix-to-cryptos-custody-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/culture\/with-latest-partnership-ledger-vault-offers-a-fix-to-cryptos-custody-problem","title":{"rendered":"With Latest Partnership, Ledger Vault Offers a Fix to Crypto\u2019s Custody Problem"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>
<\/figure>\n

Within the sphere of traditional finance, at least, crypto has a custody problem. The problem? Crypto is complicated, security is tricky and \u2014 if we\u2019re being frank \u2014 the suits don\u2019t know a bit from a byte (or a blockchain from a cloud server).<\/p>\n

In fact, you could rightly say that what makes crypto, well, crypto actually makes them nervous. Unlike settling traditional assets, you can\u2019t reverse a bitcoin transaction, the blockchain offers no internal or centralized controls and there\u2019s no one to go to if you muck up a transaction. Bitcoin is everything that the traditional finance sector is not, so it\u2019s understandable that Wall Street and friends would be wary of holding an asset they don\u2019t understand and can\u2019t control.<\/p>\n

And holding is precisely the issue. In its many ETF rejections, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission returns to the same problem (among others like market maturity) ad infinitum: ETF providers must ensure proper custody for crypto assets so mismanagement doesn\u2019t throw investor funds into the void.<\/p>\n

So how do we give these institutions proper custody to appease both them and the regulators? Striking up a partnership with Legacy Trust, a Hong Kong-based asset management firm, French hardware wallet manufacturer Ledger thinks it\u2019s whipped up a solution.<\/p>\n

Introducing Ledger Vault<\/h3>\n

\u201cWe want to be the technology provider for the folks who want self-custody, [to] have their own keys and be their own bank, but we also want to provide it to the larger institutions that want to provide a service into the marketplace,\u201d Demetrios Skalkotos, global head of Ledger Vault, told Bitcoin Magazine<\/em>.<\/p>\n

The Ledger Vault bills itself as the world\u2019s first institutional-grade, multi-authorization wallet management tool. During our interview, Skalkotos told us that the Ledger Vault separates itself from other custody solutions by being more holistic in its approach, encompassing both hardware and software technology solutions. As a tech company first, he elucidates, they\u2019re not concerned only with business practices.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are a hardware\/software security company. Most of the folks in the market today are process-oriented solutions rather than technology-oriented solutions.\u201d<\/p>\n

These solutions involve one of Ledger\u2019s existing devices, the Ledger Blue<\/a>, its BOLOS operating system<\/a> and a hardware security module (HSM). The BOLOS operating system, which powers the Ledger Blue, interacts with the HSM, which is used to store keys for transaction and fund management authorization. Skalkotos says that the combination of the two pieces of hardware and Ledger\u2019s proprietary software create an \u201cencrypted endpoint and secure channel\u201d to allow the Ledger Blue and the HSM to talk to each other. This, in turn, allows users to facilitate multi-authorized transactions.<\/p>\n

To set this up, each of the account\u2019s multiple stakeholders generate a key\/seed, which are then combined to create a master seed. Then, the shared owners devise the account\u2019s governance scheme (like how many people are needed to sign off on a transaction) and appoint administrators. These administrators can designate account operators and assign them varying degrees of responsibilities\/permissions. Ultimately, the administrators are in charge of setting rules for transactions, such as timelocks, authorization requirements, etc. But, depending on permissions, operators could have the ability to create, authorize or cancel transactions.<\/p>\n

Preferring the phrase multi-authorization<\/em> rather than multi-signature<\/em>, Skalkotos said that this scheme allows for a great degree of flexibility for fund management. The solution allows its users to set up multiple wallets and offers four levels of governance, ranging from what Skalkotos called a \u201cwarmer\u201d variant, which only requires two to three approvers, to a \u201ccolder\u201d one that would need eight to nine approvers. The latter, which would be much slower, would likely be used by a trust and could be a treasury wallet of sorts.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn essence, you’re eliminating the single point of failure. What you\u2019re providing is a device to initiate and approve a transaction as a part of a bigger governance scheme.\u201d<\/p>\n

The solution could be used by any flavor of financial firms who want to add crypto assets to their portfolio, including hedge funds, family offices, banks and trust companies. It could also be used by exchanges to bolster their security and custody practices. While Ledger Vault was built primarily for institutional custody, however, Skalkotos told us that they are \u201cworking at all levels from a retail side and institutional side.\u201d<\/p>\n

They\u2019re also working to build additional services on top of the solution, including staking services (the solution accommodates ERC20 tokens) and bolting on liquidity options.<\/p>\n

With a global team presence in San Francisco, New York, Paris and (with this latest partnership) Hong Kong, Ledger boasts of growing a \u201cdiversified group of international clients across the board\u201d since Ledger Vault went into beta in January 2019.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ledger Vault’s multi-authorization scheme allows for a greater degree of flexibility for fund management. The solution allows its users to set up multiple wallets and offers four levels of governance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3468,"featured_media":20298,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[302,780],"class_list":{"0":"post-20297","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-culture","8":"tag-custody","9":"tag-wallet"},"author_data":{"id":3468,"name":"Aaron Van Wirdum And Colin Harper","nicename":"aaron-van-wirdum-and-colin-harper","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/88b6c65a7515990786b1c04473e15469e5b0d0fffef947ed629a60854e1cb426?s=96&d=robohash&r=g"},"featured_image_url":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/with-latest-partnership.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20297","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3468"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20297"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20297\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20298"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20297"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20297"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20297"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}