{"id":19328,"date":"2019-09-19T13:00:19","date_gmt":"2019-09-19T13:00:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ci027cfe6ec00c2697"},"modified":"2025-01-27T21:24:01","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T21:24:01","slug":"discovering-bitcoin-part-4-a-wrong-turn-new-plan-needed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/culture\/discovering-bitcoin-part-4-a-wrong-turn-new-plan-needed","title":{"rendered":"Discovering Bitcoin Part 4: A Wrong Turn (New Plan Needed)!"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>
<\/figure>\n

This is the fourth installment of bitcoiner Giacomo Zucco\u2019s series \u201cDiscovering Bitcoin: A Brief Overview From Cavemen to the Lightning Network.\u201d Read the <\/em>Introduction to his series<\/em><\/a>, <\/em>Discovering Bitcoin Part 1: About Time<\/em><\/a>, <\/em>Discovering Bitcoin Part 2: About People<\/em><\/a> and <\/em>Discovering Bitcoin Part 3: Introducing Money<\/em><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

In this next installment of the \u201cDiscovering Bitcoin\u201d series, we will build on the previously acquired strategies of optimizing \u201chardness,\u201d \u201cscaleness\u201d and \u201cdarkness\u201d to explore concepts of virtualization and decentralization.<\/p>\n

The Path Toward Virtualization<\/h2>\n

The question \u201cWhere?\u201d will bring us to the (quite unhappy) end of Plan A<\/a> and the beginning of Plan \u20bf!<\/p>\n

Thanks to your noble efforts<\/a>, everybody is now using gold and silver as money. (With such a track record, you decide monetary innovation is your actual vocation: You sell your fishing fleet to focus on that exclusively.)<\/p>\n

The next innovation you introduce is \u201ccoinage.\u201d While people used to sustain important verification costs when receiving metal money, now you can pre-sign standard measures (obviously you ask for a fee for such a service, called \u201cseigniorage\u201d), and everybody can just cheaply verify your signature.<\/p>\n

<\/figure>\n

Coinage (which is particularly interesting for Bitcoin, since it\u2019s similar to the dangerous practice known as \u201cSPV,<\/a>\u201d which we will discuss later in Part 7) increases hardness locally, since lower verification costs mean higher forgery costs for occasional counterfeiters. But while it may increase locally, hardness may also decrease globally: Now you have the ability to inflate the money supply with a trick called \u201cdebasement\u201d (just put less gold in your coins than you originally promised, secretly increasing your seigniorage fee).<\/p>\n

Next, you invent \u201ccustody\u201d: Instead of securing their coins directly, people can entrust them to you, in exchange for convertible certificates. Since you leverage economies of scale and specialization, you\u2019ve become quite efficient at securing other people\u2019s money (for a fee, of course).<\/p>\n

<\/figure>\n

Custody increases scaleness dramatically! So much so that it helps the convergence process to reach its ultimate completion: Having to store just paper instead of physical gold (not very divisible) and physical silver (not very portable), people converge over the former (harder money), demonetizing the latter (the monetary premium of which will eventually collapse).<\/p>\n

But global darkness and hardness may instead decrease: In the redeeming phase, you could easily track and censor transactions, or you may practice what is called \u201cfractional reserve\u201d (keeping less collateral than issued certificates, basically inflating the \u201cvirtual\u201d supply).<\/p>\n

Complete Virtualization<\/h2>\n

Your next proposal is complete virtualization. (Funny note: Bitcoin is often called \u201cvirtual money,\u201d but money has already been \u201cvirtual\u201d for centuries!) It\u2019s the merging of custody and coinage: Instead of just entrusting you with some signed coins in order to redeem them later themselves, people can start trading your signed paper certificates directly, using them as a medium of exchange. You finally invented \u201cbanknotes\u201d!<\/p>\n

<\/figure>\n

It\u2019s not commodity money anymore; it\u2019s some kind of \u201cinformation money\u201d (not yet what we call \u201cfiat money,\u201d though \u2014 it\u2019s still a form of free-market innovation, emerged from society without any kind of legal imposition, provided by different competing actors and collateralized with physical gold in custody). Sure, you could abuse censorship, debasement and fractional reserve, if you wanted, but you aren\u2019t Mallory (our bully from Part 3<\/a>); you\u2019re a reputable professional, and these bad incentives are mitigated by the competitive pressure of several other providers.<\/p>\n

<\/figure>\n

We could consider the process of virtualization as an extreme case of specialization (after money enabled division of labor, money management itself become a specialized job itself). It\u2019s a centralizing process: Collateral physically moves from many users to the few service providers. <\/p>\n

<\/figure>\n

Ultimately, the \u201cWhere?\u201d question isn\u2019t really geographical in nature: It\u2019s more about control. The provider may have vaults, or mints, distributed across the world, but their control is centralized.<\/p>\n

A Wrong Turn: Monopoly<\/h2>\n

You haven\u2019t forgotten about Mallory the bully, right? Good, because he is the main character in the transformation from free-market virtual money to fiat money! For a while he posed as a mere competitor to your services of custody and coinage, but now he is revealing his true colors.<\/p>\n

While it was pretty difficult for him to take over the very decentralized process of people exchanging gold nuggets, there are now a few big, public, trusted, vulnerable entities he can easily seize control of.<\/p>\n

First, he uses threats of physical violence to establish a compulsory monopoly on virtual money (or even on money tout court, regardless of whether or not the physical variant is out of fashion anyway by now), ruling all the alternative money services, including yours, \u201cillegal.\u201d Then he forces everyone to always accept his particular brand of virtual money as payment at face value. (He likes to call this obligation \u201clegal-tender laws.\u201d)<\/p>\n

Finally, he abolishes any kind of redeemability of his certificates in actual gold collateral. Now the supply of money is politically defined (by Mallory-appointed central bankers, who can finally implement \u201cmonetary policies\u201d to shape the economy based on his political goals), while the demand for money is politically driven (since people are forced to own the legal tender to pay taxes to Mallory, and are forced to accept it at nominal value when they trade).<\/p>\n

<\/figure>\n

Until now, in the context of free-market virtual money, competition and market forces could have somehow still incentivized banknote issuers to \u201cbehave.\u201d With fiat money, thanks to legal monopoly and legal-tender laws, there\u2019s no competition anymore, at least not within the context of Mallory\u2019s \u201cjurisdiction.\u201d (There are other, smaller Mallories around the world, but they all joined the Big Mallory in a huge cartel).<\/p>\n

The Internet and Digitalization<\/h2>\n

Enter the digital era! With e-commerce, people need to transact over the internet, but they can\u2019t exchange paper there. Mallory\u2019s fiat money (which is already virtual) migrates to digital versions that are orders of magnitude more efficient: Scaleness increases again!<\/p>\n

Somebody could argue that in leveraging digital technologies, scaleness would have gone up even more in the competitive context of digital free-market money (since a monopoly keeps costs high while keeping efficiency, transparency and innovation rates low). But since things are improving anyway, nobody complains too much.<\/p>\n

But hardness and darkness decrease dramatically: The money supply can be manipulated to degrees never seen before, and Mallory can track and censor transactions to Orwellian extents.<\/p>\n

<\/figure>\n

As a money entrepreneur, you try to leverage the same innovations that made Mallory\u2019s money so powerful in order to bring back free-market representative money, only this time \u201con digital steroids.\u201d Your hope is that the very same internet that Mallory leveraged to increase his power could also be leveraged by you to bypass, ignore and circumvent Mallory\u2019s impositions. <\/p>\n

You launch a startup called \u201ce-gold\u201d (this is all completely fictional, of course)<\/a>. Your service allows pseudonymous users to open accounts denominated in grams of physical gold, freely transacting among them. <\/p>\n

You set it up using technological best practices and you devise innovative governance structures. After some time, your system has grown to 5 million accounts, processing the equivalent of 2 billion Mallory-dollars per year!<\/p>\n

But despite your great execution and the positive market reception, all of your technical and legal skills cannot protect you from Mallory\u2019s violence forever. Eventually, he manages to shut your business down and send you to jail, discouraging other entrepreneurs from following your example. (They pivot<\/a> to some traditional, Mallory-approved, digital fiat services instead.)<\/p>\n

<\/figure>\n

Decentralization: A New Hope?<\/h2>\n

During the time you \u201cserve\u201d in jail as a retribution for daring to try to provide better money than Mallory\u2019s, you realize something: It was very easy for Mallory to send you to jail, close your company and shut down its servers, because the personal, legal and technical structures were all easy targets.<\/p>\n

What if, this time, you replace your official identity with some internet pseudonym (the Japanese-sounding \u201cSatoshi\u201d may be just as good a choice as any), your for-profit company with an open FLOSS<\/a> project, and your server with a peer-to-peer protocol? Then Mallory would have no CEO to incarcerate, no legal entity to seize, no server to shut down!<\/p>\n

The idea is to reverse the centralization trend that has prevailed until now, while retaining most of the advantages of technological progress that enabled e-commerce and e-finance.<\/p>\n

<\/figure>\n

So far, you\u2019ve learned:<\/p>\n