{"id":543432,"date":"2025-11-04T23:30:10","date_gmt":"2025-11-04T18:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/?p=543432"},"modified":"2025-11-04T23:39:02","modified_gmt":"2025-11-04T18:09:02","slug":"hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/","title":{"rendered":"Hyperliquid&#8217;s $780M buyback soars 65% while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lose $98M"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>Key Takeaways<\/b><\/h2>\n<h3><b>How did Hyperliquid&#8217;s buyback succeed while others failed?<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hyperliquid spent $780M buying back 34.41M tokens and gained 65% as it is a revenue-generating perpetuals DEX with real token utility. Others failed to yield profit.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span><b>Which buyback programs performed worst?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Bonk led losses at -57%, despite spending $26.65 million, followed by Ether.fi (-31.4%), LayerZero (-31.5%), Kaito (-28%), and Jupiter (-27.5%).\u00a0<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Seven crypto projects spent $1.1 billion on token buybacks. Only one turned a profit, Hyperliquid. The numbers show buybacks don&#8217;t create value\u2014they amplify what already exists.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Hyperliquid wins, six others lose<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data from <a href=\"https:\/\/tokenomist.ai\/buyback\/screener\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tokenomist<\/a> shows that <a href=\"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquid-strategies-files-for-1b-public-offering-to-bolster-hype-treasury\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hyperliquid<\/a> dominates the buyback leaderboard.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_543433\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-543433\" style=\"width: 1660px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/G46nNc-bQAYJQuS.jpeg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-543433\" src=\"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/G46nNc-bQAYJQuS.jpeg\" alt=\"Hyperliquid leading the buyback race\" width=\"1660\" height=\"946\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/G46nNc-bQAYJQuS.jpeg 1660w, https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/G46nNc-bQAYJQuS-300x171.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/G46nNc-bQAYJQuS-1024x584.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/G46nNc-bQAYJQuS-768x438.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/G46nNc-bQAYJQuS-1536x875.jpeg 1536w, https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/G46nNc-bQAYJQuS-1200x684.jpeg 1200w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1660px) 100vw, 1660px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-543433\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Source: Tokenomist<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The perpetuals DEX spent $780 million buying back 34.41 million HYPE tokens. The current value is $1.28 billion, while the profit is $508.55 million, representing a margin of over 65.16%.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, everyone else failed. <a href=\"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/category\/bonk-coin-news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bonk<\/a> lost 57% despite spending $26.65 million. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">LayerZero dropped 31.5% after a $100 million buyback. Ether.fi fell 31.4% with $7.73 million spent. Jupiter declined 27.5% despite $62.12 million in buybacks.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Furthermore, Pump.fun and Kaito also trail negative, and the combined losses are $98 million across these six projects, which spent $321 million on buybacks.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Why Hyperliquid might have won<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hyperliquid generates real revenue from perpetual futures trading, and users require HYPE tokens to receive fee discounts and platform benefits. Buybacks amplified existing organic demand.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">HYPE currently trades at $38.43, down 4.33% on the day but maintaining strength after climbing from $35 lows in late October. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The accumulation\/distribution indicator shows sustained buying pressure despite short-term volatility.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The massive $780 million buyback created a genuine supply shock on a relatively new token with limited circulation.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Additionally, Hyperliquid made strategic purchases during the platform&#8217;s growth phase, not after reaching peak prices.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Why other projects might have made a loss<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Bonk, for one, has no revenue model and limited utility, and the buyback tried to create artificial demand. However, the market saw through it.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Bonk trades at $0.00001166, down from its October highs of around $0.000027, representing a brutal 56% collapse. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Accumulation indicators show massive distribution with -30.47 trillion tokens leaving holder accounts.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Jupiter faces similar issues. Despite being Solana&#8217;s leading DEX, its $62 million buyback couldn&#8217;t overcome weak token utility. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">LayerZero spent $100 million but offers unclear token value beyond speculation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The pattern repeats: projects with weak fundamentals often use buybacks as a band-aid. Markets rejected the artificial support.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Seven crypto projects spent $1.1 billion on token buybacks. Only one worked; Hyperliquid. Bonk, Jupiter, LayerZero, and others lost $98M combined.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":76,"featured_media":543434,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[31,6389,66,3,4,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-543432","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-altcoins-news","category-bonk-coin-news","category-new-news","category-news","category-social","category-trading-view"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.0 (Yoast SEO v28.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Hyperliquid&#039;s $780M buyback soars 65% while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lose $98M - AMBCrypto<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Hyperliquid&#039;s $780M buyback gained $508M while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lost $98M combined. Analysis reveals why only one succeeded.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hyperliquid&#039;s $780M buyback soars 65% while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lose $98M - AMBCrypto\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Seven crypto projects spent $1.1 billion on token buybacks. Only one worked; Hyperliquid. Bonk, Jupiter, LayerZero, and others lost $98M combined.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"AMBCrypto\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cryptoamb\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-04T18:00:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-04T18:09:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Hyperliquid.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Adewale Olarinde\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/WaleRexx\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@CryptoAmb\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Adewale Olarinde\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"ReportageNewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Adewale Olarinde\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/a3ac3193a21ee61fa9d68ccd6bfa3885\"},\"headline\":\"Hyperliquid&#8217;s $780M buyback soars 65% while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lose $98M\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-04T18:00:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-04T18:09:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":396,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/Hyperliquid.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Altcoin\",\"Bonk\",\"News\",\"News 1\",\"Social\",\"Trading View\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\\\/#respond\"]}],\"copyrightYear\":\"2025\",\"copyrightHolder\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/#organization\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\\\/\",\"name\":\"Hyperliquid's $780M buyback soars 65% while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lose $98M - AMBCrypto\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/Hyperliquid.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-04T18:00:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-04T18:09:02+00:00\",\"description\":\"Hyperliquid's $780M buyback gained $508M while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lost $98M combined. Analysis reveals why only one succeeded.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/Hyperliquid.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/Hyperliquid.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Hyperliquid's $780M buyback soars 65% while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lose $98M\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"AMBCrypto\",\"description\":\"Stay Ahead!\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"AMBCrypto News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"AMBCrypto\",\"alternateName\":\"AMBCrypto News\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/amb-wide.jpg\",\"width\":600,\"height\":60,\"caption\":\"AMBCrypto\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/cryptoamb\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/CryptoAmb\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/13629485\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/a3ac3193a21ee61fa9d68ccd6bfa3885\",\"name\":\"Adewale Olarinde\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/IMG_2326-scaled-e1760632492733-100x100.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/IMG_2326-scaled-e1760632492733-100x100.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/10\\\/IMG_2326-scaled-e1760632492733-100x100.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Adewale Olarinde\"},\"description\":\"Adewale Olarinde is a crypto journalist and data-driven storyteller with a Master\u2019s degree in International Relations. He covers digital assets, markets, and policy with a focus on clarity and context. Outside of work, he\u2019s a lifelong Manchester United supporter and a big music lover.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/adewale-olarinde-a90961168\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/https:\\\/\\\/twitter.com\\\/WaleRexx\"],\"knowsAbout\":[\"Technical Analysis\",\"Crypto Market Trends\",\"Crypto Market Analysis\"],\"jobTitle\":\"Journalist\",\"worksFor\":\"AMBCrypto\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ambcrypto.com\\\/author\\\/adewale-olarinde\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hyperliquid's $780M buyback soars 65% while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lose $98M - AMBCrypto","description":"Hyperliquid's $780M buyback gained $508M while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lost $98M combined. Analysis reveals why only one succeeded.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hyperliquid's $780M buyback soars 65% while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lose $98M - AMBCrypto","og_description":"Seven crypto projects spent $1.1 billion on token buybacks. Only one worked; Hyperliquid. Bonk, Jupiter, LayerZero, and others lost $98M combined.","og_url":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/","og_site_name":"AMBCrypto","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cryptoamb","article_published_time":"2025-11-04T18:00:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-04T18:09:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Hyperliquid.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Adewale Olarinde","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/WaleRexx","twitter_site":"@CryptoAmb","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Adewale Olarinde","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"ReportageNewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/"},"author":{"name":"Adewale Olarinde","@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a3ac3193a21ee61fa9d68ccd6bfa3885"},"headline":"Hyperliquid&#8217;s $780M buyback soars 65% while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lose $98M","datePublished":"2025-11-04T18:00:10+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-04T18:09:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/"},"wordCount":396,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Hyperliquid.png","articleSection":["Altcoin","Bonk","News","News 1","Social","Trading View"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/#respond"]}],"copyrightYear":"2025","copyrightHolder":{"@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/#organization"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/","url":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/","name":"Hyperliquid's $780M buyback soars 65% while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lose $98M - AMBCrypto","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Hyperliquid.png","datePublished":"2025-11-04T18:00:10+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-04T18:09:02+00:00","description":"Hyperliquid's $780M buyback gained $508M while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lost $98M combined. Analysis reveals why only one succeeded.","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/hyperliquids-780m-buyback-soars-65-while-jupiter-bonk-and-layerzero-lose-98m\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Hyperliquid.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Hyperliquid.png","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Hyperliquid's $780M buyback soars 65% while Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lose $98M"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/","name":"AMBCrypto","description":"Stay Ahead!","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/#organization"},"alternateName":"AMBCrypto News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/#organization","name":"AMBCrypto","alternateName":"AMBCrypto News","url":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/amb-wide.jpg","width":600,"height":60,"caption":"AMBCrypto"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cryptoamb","https:\/\/x.com\/CryptoAmb","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/13629485\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a3ac3193a21ee61fa9d68ccd6bfa3885","name":"Adewale Olarinde","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/IMG_2326-scaled-e1760632492733-100x100.jpg","url":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/IMG_2326-scaled-e1760632492733-100x100.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/IMG_2326-scaled-e1760632492733-100x100.jpg","caption":"Adewale Olarinde"},"description":"Adewale Olarinde is a crypto journalist and data-driven storyteller with a Master\u2019s degree in International Relations. He covers digital assets, markets, and policy with a focus on clarity and context. Outside of work, he\u2019s a lifelong Manchester United supporter and a big music lover.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/adewale-olarinde-a90961168","https:\/\/x.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/WaleRexx"],"knowsAbout":["Technical Analysis","Crypto Market Trends","Crypto Market Analysis"],"jobTitle":"Journalist","worksFor":"AMBCrypto","url":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/author\/adewale-olarinde\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/543432","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/76"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=543432"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/543432\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/543434"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=543432"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=543432"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ambcrypto.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=543432"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}